Western harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis) COSEWIC assessment and update report: chapter 11

Technical Summary

Reithrodontomys megalotis megalotis

Western harvest mouse megalotis subspecies – Souris des moissons de la sous-espèce megalotis

Range of Occurrence in Canada:
British Columbia

Extent and Area Informationa

Extent of occurrence (EO) (km²):
2,850 km²
Specify trend in EO:
Stable
Are there extreme fluctuations in EO?
No
Area of occupancy (AO) (km²):
108 km²
Specify trend in AO
Stable
Are there extreme fluctuations in AO?
No
Number of known or inferred current locations?
18
Specify trend in #
Increasing
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of locations?
No
Specify trend in area, extent or quality of habitat:
Decreasing

aArea information was estimated based on present (i.e., post-1970) locations (see Fig. 2). AO was estimated following IUCN guidelines and used a 2 x 2 km (4 km²) grid.

Population Information

Generation time (average age of parents in the population):
6 months
Number of mature individuals:
Unknown
Total population trend:
Unknown
% decline over the last/next 10 years or 3 generations.
Unknown
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals?
Yes
Is the total population severely fragmented?
Yes
Specify trend in number of populations?
Increasing
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations?
No

List populations with number of mature individuals in each:

Threats (actual or imminent threats to populations or habitats)

Rescue Effect (immigration from an outside source)

Status of outside population(s)?
USA:
T5 (very common) 
Washington :
S4 (secure with restricted range)
Is immigration known or possible?
not known, but possible
Would immigrants be adapted to survive in Canada?
Yes
Is there sufficient habitat for immigrants in Canada?
Unknown
Is rescue from outside populations likely?
No
Quantitative Analysis:
n/a

Current Status

COSEWIC:
Special concern (1994, 2007)
Provincial status:
Vulnerable (Blue Listed)

Status and Reasons for Designation

Status
Special concern
Alpha-numeric code
not applicable

Reasons for Designation

This subspecies has a limited range, and a small extent of occurrence and area of occupancy. However, the extent of occurrence and area of occupancy appear to be constant. Its principal native habitat in the Okanagan as well as old fields is declining. Furthermore, old apple orchards where the mouse has been caught are being converted to vineyards. Dispersal distance is limited and the likelihood of rescue effect is small. Extensive sampling has revealed the occurrence of the mouse at more localities. 63,000 hectares of suitable habitat is protected.

Applicability of Criteria

Criterion A: (Declining Total Population): There is no direct evidence of a declining population trend and there are no good data on population size.  It appears to be naturally rare and occurs at low densities.

Criterion B: (Small Distribution, and Decline or Fluctuation): EO < 3,000 km²; AO &lt; 110 km². Close to meeting threatened B2ab but the population is not fragmented and there are greater than 10 localities.

Criterion C: (Small Total Population Size and Decline): Total population size is unknown and there may be limited habitat available.

Criterion D: (Very Small Population or Restricted Distribution): There is likely limited availability and high demand for exploitation of the remaining habitat, and the remaining populations appear to be fragmented.

Criterion E: (Quantitative Analysis): Not applicable.

Reithrodontomys megalotis dychei

Western harvest mouse dychei subspecies – Souris des moissons de la sous-espèce dychei

Range of Occurrence in Canada:
Alberta

Extent and Area Informationa

Extent of occurrence (EO) (km²) based on locations:
459 km²
Specify trend in EO:
Decreasing
Are there extreme fluctuations in EO?
Unknown
Area of occupancy (AO) (km²) based on locations:
156 km²
Specify trend in AO:
Decreasing
Are there extreme fluctuations in AO?
Unknown
Number of known or inferred current locationsb:
1
Specify trend in #:
Decreasing
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of locations?
No
Specify trend in area, extent or quality of habitat:
Decreasing

aArea information was estimated based on present (i.e., post-1970) locations (see Fig. 2).  AO was estimated following IUCN guidelines and used a 2 x 2 km (4 km²) grid.

bAll present records are from within a single large locality, the Suffield National Wildlife Area (459 km²).

Population Information

Generation time (average age of parents in the population):
6 months
Number of mature individuals:
Unknown
Total population trend:
Unknown
% decline over the last/next 10 years or 3 generations.
Unknown
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals?
Yes
Is the total population severely fragmented?
Yes
Specify trend in number of populations:
Decreasing
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations?
No

List populations with number of mature individuals in each:

Threats (actual or imminent threats to populations or habitats)

Rescue Effect (immigration from an outside source)

Status of outside population(s)?
USA:
T5 (very common)
Montana:
S4 (secure with restricted range)
Is immigration known or possible?
not known, but possible
Would immigrants be adapted to survive in Canada?
Yes
Is there sufficient habitat for immigrants in Canada?
Unknown
Is rescue from outside populations likely?
No
Quantitative Analysis:
n/a

Current Status

COSEWIC:
Data Deficient, April 1994
Dycheisubspecies:
Endangered (2007)
Provincial status:
Undetermined

Status and Reasons for Designation

Status
Endangered
Alpha-numeric code:  
B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)c(iv)

Reasons for Designation

This subspecies has a limited range and has been found at only one location in the past 40 years; this location is isolated from others. Dispersal distance is limited and the population fluctuates. This species is commonly found in owl pellets in the USA, but none have been reported in owl pellets (including burrowing owls) in Suffield or other areas in southeast Alberta, despite substantial sampling. Owl pellet analysis is an excellent means of sampling for these mice.

Applicability of Criteria

Criterion A: (Declining Total Population): There is no direct evidence of a declining population, but there are no good data on population size.  There appears to be only one isolated population. 

Criterion B: (Small Distribution, and Decline or Fluctuation): Endangered under B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)c(iv): Small extent of occurrence and area of occupancy. Fewer than 5 locations and decreasing EO, AO and number of populations. Fluctuation in number of individuals.

Criterion C: (Small Total Population Size and Decline): Would fit Threatened under C2ii if there were fewer than 10,000 adults during population 'lows' and there was only the single population.

Criterion D: (Very Small Population or Restricted Distribution):  Appears to be only one isolated population.

Criterion E: (Quantitative Analysis): Not applicable.

Page details

Date modified: