Mountain holly fern (Polystichum scopulinum) proposed recovery strategy 2016: part 2
Part 2
Recovery Strategy for the mountain holly fern (Castilleja rupicola) in British Columbia, Québec, and Newfoundland and Labrador, prepared by the Mountain Holly Fern Advisory Committee for the British Columbia Ministry of Environment
May 2009
Table of Contents - Part 2
- Advisory Committee Members
- Author
- Responsible Jurisdictions
- Acknowledgements
- Executive Summary
- Background
- Recovery
- Recovery Feasibility
- Recovery Goal
- Rationale for the Recovery Goal
- Recovery Objectives
- Approaches Recommended to Meet Recovery Objectives
- Performance Measures
- Critical Habitat
- Existing and Recommended Approaches to Habitat Protection
- Effects on Other Species
- Socioeconomic Considerations
- Recommended Approach for Recovery Implementation
- Statement on Action Plans
- References
List of Tables
- Table 1. Canadian populations of mountain holly fern.
- Table 2. Conservation status of mountain holly fern at the subnational level.
- Table 3. Threat classification table for mountain holly fern.
- Table 4. Recovery planning table for mountain holly fern.
- Table 5. Schedule of studies.
- Table 6. Recovery implementation approach.
List of Figures
- Figure 1. Illustration of mountain holly fern.
- Figure 2. Map of global distribution of mountain holly fern.
- Figure 3. Map of mountain holly fern distribution in British Columbia.
- Figure 4. Map of mountain holly fern distribution in Eastern Canada.
- Figure 5. Map of mountain holly fern distribution in Canada in relation to ultramafic geology.
- Figure 6. Mining activity locations in the vicinity of mountain holly fern populations in B.C.
Document Information - Part 2
About the British Columbia Recovery Strategy Series
This series presents the recovery strategies that are prepared as advice to the Province of British Columbia on the general strategic approach required to recover species at risk. The Province prepares recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada, and the Canada – British Columbia Agreement on Species at Risk.
What is recovery?
Species at risk recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a species’ persistence in the wild.
What is a recovery strategy?
A recovery strategy represents the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to achieve recovery of a species or ecosystem. A recovery strategy outlines what is and what is not known about a species or ecosystem; it also identifies threats to the species or ecosystem, and what should be done to mitigate those threats. Recovery strategies set recovery goals and objectives, and recommend approaches to recover the species or ecosystem.
Recovery strategies are usually prepared by a recovery team with members from agencies responsible for the management of the species or ecosystem, experts from other agencies, universities, conservation groups, aboriginal groups, and stakeholder groups as appropriate.
What’s next?
In most cases, one or more action plan(s) will be developed to define and guide implementation of the recovery strategy. Action plans include more detailed information about what needs to be done to meet the objectives of the recovery strategy. However, the recovery strategy provides valuable information on threats to the species and their recovery needs that may be used by individuals, communities, land users, and conservationists interested in species at risk recovery.
For more information
To learn more about species at risk recovery in British Columbia, please visit the Ministry of Environment Recovery Planning
Recommended citation:
Mountain Holly Fern Advisory Committee. 2009. Recovery strategy for the mountain holly fern (Polystichum scopulinum) in British Columbia, Québec, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Prepared for the B.C. Ministry of Environment, Victoria, BC. 23 pp.
Cover illustration/photograph
Ben Legler
Additional copies
Additional copies can be downloaded from the B.C. Ministry of Environment Recovery Planning webpage.
Content (excluding illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.
Disclaimer
This recovery strategy has been prepared by the Mountain Holly Fern Advisory Committee, as advice to the responsible jurisdictions and organizations that may be involved in recovering the species. The British Columbia Ministry of Environment has received this advice as part of fulfilling its commitments under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada, and the Canada – British Columbia Agreement on Species at Risk.
This document identifies the recovery strategies that are deemed necessary, based on the best available scientific and traditional information, to recover mountain holly fern populations in Canada. Recovery actions to achieve the goals and objectives identified herein are subject to the priorities and budgetary constraints of participatory agencies and organizations. These goals, objectives, and recovery approaches may be modified in the future to accommodate new objectives and findings.
The responsible jurisdictions and all members of the recovery team have had an opportunity to review this document. However, this document does not necessarily represent the official positions of the agencies or the personal views of all individuals on the recovery team.
Success in the recovery of this species depends on the commitment and cooperation of many different constituencies that may be involved in implementing the directions set out in this strategy. The Ministry of Environment encourages all British Columbians to participate in the recovery of mountain holly fern.
Advisory Committee Members
Mountain Holly Fern Advisory Committee
- Brenda Costanzo (B.C. Ministry of Environment)
- Ted Lea (retired Ecologist)
- Lucy Reiss (Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific &Yukon)
- Guy Jolicoeur (Province of Québec)
- Alain Branchaud (Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Québec)
- Joe Brazil (Province of Newfoundland and Labrador)
- Peter Thomas (Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Atlantic)
Author
Ksenia Barton
Responsible Jurisdictions
The British Columbia Ministry of Environment is responsible for producing a recovery strategy for mountain holly fern under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. The government of Québec, the government of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Environment Canada’s Canadian Wildlife Service participated in the preparation of this recovery strategy.
Acknowledgements
The Province of British Columbia funded the preparation of this recovery strategy. The following reviewers provided useful comments on the first draft: Brenda Costanzo, Orville Dyer, Claudia Hanel, Ted Lea, Lucy Reiss, Peter Thomas, and Matthew Wild. The following people provided helpful information for the recovery strategy: Joseph Arnett, Adolf Ceska, Frédéric Coursol, Claudia Hanel, Gary Lewis, Malcolm Martin, Jenifer Penny, Gail Smart, and Matthew Wild. Laura Super provided literature research support services.
Executive Summary
Mountain holly fern (Polystichum scopulinum) was designated by COSEWIC as threatened in Canada in May 2005 and is listed on the federal Species at Risk Act Schedule 1. Its current known Canadian range consists of five populations found in British Columbia, Québec, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Mountain holly fern is an evergreen, perennial fern with leaflets that are folded inward and twisted horizontally with slanting bases. This fern is a species of montane ultramafic (serpentine) outcrops. In British Columbia, it is found in three populations in the Tulameen River valley. As well, it is found in 2 other provinces: one population in Québec on the Gaspé Peninsula, and a historic population in western Newfoundland and Labrador at North Arm Mountain.
In general, specific local threats apply primarily to the British Columbia populations of mountain holly fern. No specific local threats to the Québec population are known. It is not known whether the Newfoundland and Labrador population is extant, but the historic locality is remote and not at risk from human activities.
No critical habitat, as defined under the federal Species at Risk Act is proposed for identification at this time. It is expected that critical habitat will be proposed following consultation and development of stewardship options with affected landowners and organizations, and completion of outstanding work required to identify specific habitat and area requirements for this species.
The recovery goal for mountain holly fern is to protect and maintain all known populations in Canada.
The recovery objectives for this species are
- to secure long-term protection for extant populations and their habitats (areas of occupancy plus appropriate essential habitat);
- to refine the current distribution of the species in Canada;
- to address knowledge gaps including: determining population trends, demographic patterns, and life history (survival and reproduction) of extant populations; and
- to determine whether augmentation of the populations is necessary and, if required, develop and test techniques to establish populations on existing and historic sites.
Background
Species Assessment Information from COSEWIC
- Date of Assessment:
- March 2005
- Common Name (population):
- Mountain holly fern
- Scientific Name:
- Polystichum scopulinum
- COSEWIC Status:
- Threatened
- Reason for designation:
- A fern of very restricted occurrence on serpentine substrates in three widely separated areas of Canada. These very small populations are at risk from stochastic events and, the three in British Columbia, from potential mining activities for precious metals.
- Canadian Occurrence:
- British Columbia, Québec, Newfoundland and Labrador
- COSEWIC Status History:
- Designated Threatened in May 2005. Assessment is based on a new status report.
Description of the Species
Mountain holly fern, Polystichum scopulinum, is an evergreen, perennial fern (Figure 1). The stems curve upwards and the upright leaves (fronds) are 10–30 cm long (occasionally ≤ 50 cm long). The leaf stalk (petiole) is 0.2–0.33% the length of the leaf and is densely covered in light brown scales that become smaller and sparser towards the leaf. The leaf is several times longer than wide, broadest above the base, and narrowed towards the tip. The leaf is divided into leaflets (pinnae) that are themselves partially divided. The 1–3 cm long leaflets are longer than broad, with nearly parallel sides but narrowing towards the tips. Leaflets are overlapping, folded inward, and twisted horizontally, with slanting bases. Leaflet edges have fine, sharp, forward-pointing teeth that curve inward. Leaflet tips range from bein blunt to having a short, abrupt, rigid point. Towards the tip of the leaflet, the teeth are smaller than the tooth at the tip. The underside of the leaf has a sparse covering of small hair-like growths that have stout projections. The growths are much longer than wide, broadest above the base, and narrowed towards the tips. The thin, scale-like coverings (indusia) of the immature spore-producing bodies (sori) are fringed with hairs. The spores are brown. Several technical descriptions of the species are available (including Wagner 1993; Douglas et al. 2000).
Populations and Distribution
Globally, mountain holly fern is restricted to North America (Figure 2). The species ranges from southwestern British Columbia (B.C.), sporadically south in the western United States (U.S.) to Colorado, Arizona, and California. Disjunct populations also occur in eastern Québec and western insular Newfoundland and Labrador (Wagner 1993; COSEWIC 2005).
In Canada, mountain holly fern occurs in B.C., Québec, and Newfoundland and Labrador (Figures 3 and 4). The B.C. populations are at the northern extent of their range in North America. Table 1 summarizes the details of the Canadian populations.
Population | Location | Land tenure | Year last observed status | Number of plants | Area of occupancy | Proximity to other populations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olivine Mountain | Near Tulameen, BC | B.C. Crown land | 1996 Extant |
4 | 200 m2 | 2.5 km from Britton Ck. population; 230 km from nearest known population in the U.S. (WA) |
Britton Creek | Near Tulameen, BC | B.C. Crown land | 2002 Extant |
400Noteaof Table 1 | 1 ha | 1.1 km from Grasshopper Mtn. population; 230 km from nearest population in the U.S. (WA) |
Grasshopper Mountain (2 subpopulations) | Near Tulameen, BC | B.C. Crown land | 1996 Extant |
5 + 30Notebof Table 1 | 200 m2 + 500 m2 | 1.1 km from Britton Ck. population; 230 km from nearest population in the U.S. (WA) |
Mont Albert | Southerly slopes of the Vallée du Diable, eastern flank of Mont Albert, Gaspé Peninsula, QC | Québec Crown land in Gaspésie National Park | 2004 Extant |
215 | 8 ha | 550 km from historic NL population; 3200 km from closest population in the U.S. (CO) |
North Arm Mountain, Bay of Islands | Western Newfoundland and Labrador, NL | NL Crown land | 1950 Unknown |
? | ? | 550 km from QC population; 3800 km from closest population in the U.S. (CO) |
Globally, mountain holly fern has a Secure (G5) Conservation Status Rank, meaning that it is common, widespread, and abundant (NatureServe 2007). In the U.S., the species’ conservation status rank has not been assessed. In Canada, the species is considered Critically Imperiled (N1) (NatureServe 2007) and Threatened (COSEWIC 2005). The conservation status of the species at the state and provincial levels is summarized in Table 2. Mountain holy fern is a priority 2 species under goal 3 of the B.C. Conservation Framework.
Country | Province or state | NatureServe rank code | NatureServe rank |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | British Columbia | S1 | Critically Imperiled |
Canada | Québec | S1 | Critically Imperiled |
Canada | Newfoundland and Labrador | SH | Possibly Extirpated (Historical) |
U.S. | Arizona | S2 | Imperiled |
U.S. | California | SNR | Unranked |
U.S. | Colorado | S1 | Critically Imperiled |
U.S. | Idaho | SNR | Unranked |
U.S. | Montana | S1 | Critically Imperiled |
U.S. | Nevada | SNR | Unranked |
U.S. | Oregon | SNR | Unranked |
U.S. | Utah | S2 | Imperiled |
U.S. | Washington | SNR | Unranked |
U.S. | Wyoming | SH | Possibly Extirpated (Historical) |
If the mountain holly fern populations in Canada are lost, the potential for populations to re-establish from spores dispersed from other populations is relatively low. While fern spores can disperse across remarkable distances (Wagner and Rouleau 1984; Barrington 1993), many fern species appear to have difficulty in establishing and recruiting new individuals (Wild et al. 2006). While mountain holly fern spores can disperse across thousands of kilometers, the species apparently has low success in colonizing new sites based on the number of apparently suitable montane ultramafic sites (see “Habitat and biological needs” section for description) that are not occupied by the species (Figure 5).
Although the global population size of mountain holly fern is unknown, it is likely that the estimated population size of less than 1000 plants in Canada (COSEWIC 2005) represents far less than 1% of the global population.
Little is known about the rate of change in geographical distribution and populations of mountain holly fern in Canada. All populations are known to be extant except for the Newfoundland and Labrador one, the status of which is unknown since it was originally discovered in 1950. The collection location is vague and the area is very remote (boat access), therefore is it possible that the population has persisted to the present without being re-discovered (COSEWIC 2005; C. Hanel, pers. comm., 2007). British Columbia and Québec populations are assumed to be stable.
Needs of the Mountain Holly Fern
Habitat and biological needs
Mountain holly fern is a species of montane ultramafic (serpentine) outcrops (Wagner 1993). Ultramafic rocks are granular, and consist almost entirely of ferromagnesian minerals (Longwell et al. 1969). Habitats associated with ultramafic outcrops have several distinct characteristics that influence vegetation:
- ultramafic rocks are highly erodible (Brooks 1987);
- available water in the soil is generally reduced by adsorption to montmorillonite clays (Brooks 1987);
- ultramafic slopes can also have excess moisture in the form of seepage, as is commonly observed in Newfoundland and Labrador (C. Hanel, pers. comm., 2007);
- soils are poor in nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients, and the calcium: magnesium ratio is low (Kruckeberg 1984; Brooks 1987); and
- soils may be toxic to most plants due to the presence of heavy metals such as chromium and nickel (Brooks 1987).
In B.C., mountain holly fern occurs along the ultramafic band (olivine clinopyroxenite) between Olivine Mountain and Grasshopper Mountain in the Tulameen River valley. The mountain holly fern populations occur at elevations from 979 to 1768 m. The vegetation of the sites is characteristically depauperate (in contrast to the dense surrounding forest), with dominant species including lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta), whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis), Indian’s-dream (Aspidotis densa), Kruckeberg’s holly fern (Polystichum kruckebergii), common juniper (Juniperus communis), lance-leaved stonecrop (Sedum lanceolatum), Rocky Mountain butterweed (Senecio streptanthifolius), and kinnikinnick (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi).
In Québec, mountain holly fern occurs in a south-facing montane setting above the treeline (800–900 m). The fern grows in cracks in the ultramafic bedrock (serpentinite, dunite, and pyroxenite) and at the bases of large rocks. The depauperate vegetation is dominated by black spruce (Picea mariana), dwarf birch (Betula nana), Labrador tea (Ledum groenlandicum), lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea), and shrubby cinquefoil (Dasiphora floribunda). Associated plants include local serpentine endemics such as serpentine stitchwort (Minuartia marcescens), green-scaled willow (Salix chlorolepis), and Mount Albert goldenrod (Solidago simplex ssp. simplex var. chlorolepis), as well as eastern disjuncts such as Aleutian maidenhair (Adiantum aleuticum) and Indian’s dream (Aspidotis densa) (COSEWIC 2005; MDDEP 2006).
The original locality description for the Newfoundland and Labrador occurrence was given as “southerly slopes of dry serpentine ridge” (Wagner and Rouleau 1984).
The gametophytic stage of mountain holly fern has not been observed in Canada, and its habitat requirements are unknown.
Ecological role
The ecological role of mountain holly fern is unknown, but it is assumed to be minor given its small population sizes (Table 1). The ultramafic habitat of the species may allow the species to survive in a situation where competition from other vegetation is low.
Limiting factors
Several biological factors limit the recovery potential of mountain holly fern in Canada.
Potentially sterile populations
Given their dramatically disjunct locations, the Québec and Newfoundland and Labrador populations of mountain holly fern can be assumed to have arisen from spore dispersal. In Washington State, however, primary sterile diploid hybrids of the species have been found (as opposed to the normal fertile tetraploid form) (Wagner and Rouleau 1984). Sterile hybrids are incapable of dispersing or reproducing by spores and depend totally on vegetative reproduction. Given the proximity of the B.C. populations to the Washington State ones, it is possible that some or all of the B.C. populations consist of sterile diploid hybrids.
Ecological requirements of gametophytic stage
If Canadian populations of mountain holly fern do reproduce by spore then, like other ferns, the colonization and persistence of the species may be limited by the ecological requirements of the gametophytic stage, including the need for specific moisture regimes and substratum chemistry (Given 1993; Wild et al. 2006). This factor has been used to explain the frequently observed “empty niche” phenomenon in fern species, where apparently suitable habitat is not occupied (Wild and Gagnon 2005). In B.C., George Douglas speculated that mountain holly fern reproduction occurs primarily through vegetative means, given that he failed to find gametophytes in the field (COSEWIC 2005). However, the failure to find gametophytes for fern species is not uncommon (Farrar 1976).
Poor competitors
Ferns tend to be poor competitors with other plant species and this could also limit the colonization and persistence of mountain holly fern (Given 1993).
Habitat specificity and limited habitat extent
Because montane ultramafic habitats are relatively rare in Canada, there is relatively little potential habitat for mountain holly fern to colonize. The habitat of the species is also inherently highly fragmented (controlled by geological outcroppings). The species may also have additional unknown habitat requirements at the edges of its range that further limit its potential habitat.
Small population sizes
The small population sizes of the species in Canada (see Table 1) place the populations at risk for extirpation due to demographic stochasticity.
Threats
In general, specific local threats apply primarily to the B.C. populations of mountain holly fern. No specific local threats to the Québec population, which occurs in the Gaspésie National Park, are known (F. Coursol, pers. comm., 2007). It is not known whether the Newfoundland and Labrador population is extant; however, the assumed historical locality is very remote and not currently at risk from human activities (C. Hanel, pers. comm., 2007).
Threat classification
Potential threats to the survival of mountain holly fern populations in B.C. include mining, road construction, slope failure, and severe fire. Current threats to the species within in B.C. include mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) control and mineral exploration. Potential threats in all three provinces include climate change and botanical collecting (summarized in Table 3).
Classification Type | Threat Type | Threat description | Threat attributes Local |
Threat attributes Range-wide |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Mineral exploration | Threat category | Habitat loss or degradation, accidental mortality | Extent: Widespread in B.C. | Extent: Widespread in B.C. |
1. Mineral exploration | General threat | Mineral exploration | - | - |
1. Mineral exploration | Stress | Increased mortality, reduction in population size, population extinction | - | - |
1. Mineral exploration | Occurrence | - | B.C.: anticipated QC: not anticipated NL: not anticipated |
Unknown |
1. Mineral exploration | Frequency | - | Unknown | Unknown |
1. Mineral exploration | Causal certainty | - | High | High |
1. Mineral exploration | Severity | - | High | High |
1. Mineral exploration | Level of concern | - | Medium | Medium |
2. Mining | Threat category | Habitat loss or degradation, accidental mortality | Extent: Widespread in B.C. | Extent: Widespread in B.C. |
2. Mining | General threat | Mining | - | - |
2. Mining | Specific threat | Destruction, removal, or burial of plants and alteration of habitat | - | - |
2. Mining | Stress | Increased mortality, reduction in population size, population extinction | - | - |
2. Mining | Occurrence | - | B.C.: anticipated QC: not anticipated NL: not anticipated |
Unknown |
2. Mining | Frequency | - | Unknown | Unknown |
2. Mining | Causal certainty | - | Low | Low |
2. Mining | Severity | - | Low | Low |
2. Mining | Level of concern | - | Low | Low |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | Threat category | Habitat loss or degradation, accidental mortality | Extent: Widespread in B.C. | Extent: Widespread in B.C. |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | General threat | Harvesting of Pinus trees to control the spread of the mountain pine beetle | - | - |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | Specific threat | Destruction or burial of plants and alteration of habitat | - | - |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | Stress | Increased mortality, reduction in population size, population extinction | - | - |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | Occurrence | - | B.C.: anticipated QC: not anticipated NL: not anticipated |
- |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | Frequency | - | One-time | - |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | Causal certainty | - | Low | - |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | Severity | - | High | - |
3. Mountain pine beetle control | Level of concern | - | Medium | Medium |
4. Road construction | Threat category | Habitat loss or degradation, accidental mortality | Extent: Widespread in B.C. | Extent: Widespread in B.C. |
4. Road construction | General threat | Road construction | - | - |
4. Road construction | Specific threat | Destruction, removal, or burial of plants and alteration of habitat | - | - |
4. Road construction | Stress | Increased mortality, reduction in population size, population extinction | - | - |
4. Road construction | Occurrence | - | B.C.: anticipated QC: not anticipated NL: not anticipated |
Unknown |
4. Road construction | Frequency | - | One-time | One-time |
4. Road construction | Causal certainty | - | High | High |
4. Road construction | Severity | - | High | High |
4. Road construction | Level of concern | - | Medium | Medium |
5. Climate change | Threat category | Climate and natural disasters | Extent: Widespread | Extent: Widespread |
5. Climate change | General threat | Climate change | - | - |
5. Climate change | Specific threat | Potential for increased frequency and length of drought periods | - | - |
5. Climate change | Stress | Poor reproductive success, increased mortality, reduction in population size, population extinction | - | - |
5. Climate change | Occurrence | - | - | Current |
5. Climate change | Frequency | - | - | Seasonal |
5. Climate change | Causal certainty | - | - | Low |
5. Climate change | Severity | - | - | Unknown |
5. Climate change | Level of concern | - | Low | Low |
6. Slope failure | Threat category | Climate and natural disasters | Extent: Widespread | Extent: Widespread |
6. Slope failure | General threat | Slope failure | - | - |
6. Slope failure | Specific threat | Destruction, burial, and uprooting of plants | - | - |
6. Slope failure | Stress | Increased mortality, reduction in population size, population extinction | - | - |
6. Slope failure | Occurrence | - | - | Anticipated |
6. Slope failure | Frequency | - | - | Recurrent |
6. Slope failure | Causal certainty | - | - | Low |
6. Slope failure | Severity | - | - | High |
6. Slope failure | Level of concern | - | Low | Low |
7. Severe fire | Threat category | Climate and natural disasters | Extent: Widespread | Extent: Widespread |
7. Severe fire | General threat | Severe fire | - | - |
7. Severe fire | Specific threat | Destruction of plants | - | - |
7. Severe fire | Stress | Poor reproductive success, increased mortality, reduction in population size, population extinction | - | - |
7. Severe fire | Occurrence | - | B.C.: anticipated QC: not anticipated NL: not anticipated |
Anticipated |
7. Severe fire | Frequency | - | - | Recurrent |
7. Severe fire | Causal certainty | - | - | Low |
7. Severe fire | Severity | - | - | High |
7. Severe fire | Level of concern | - | Low | Low |
8. Botanical collecting | Threat category | Disturbance or persecution | Extent: Widespread | Extent: Widespread |
8. Botanical collecting | General threat | Discriminate killing | - | - |
8. Botanical collecting | Specific threat | Collection of botanical specimens | - | - |
8. Botanical collecting | Stress | Reduction in population size, population extinction | - | - |
8. Botanical collecting | Occurrence | - | - | Anticipated |
8. Botanical collecting | Frequency | - | - | Unknown |
8. Botanical collecting | Causal certainty | - | - | Medium |
8. Botanical collecting | Severity | - | Moderate in Canada | Low |
8. Botanical collecting | Level of concern | - | Low | Low |
B.C. = British Columbia; NL = Newfoundland and Labrador; QC = Québec.
Description of the threats
Mining
Mining was identified as the primary potential threat to mountain holly fern in B.C. (COSEWIC 2005). Bright Star Ventures, a mining exploration company (now delisted), no longer seems to be active in the area as was the case when the status report was written (COSEWIC 2005). Despite decades of intensive exploration activities in the area, most prospects fail to get developed. Mining is not considered to be a threat for Québec or Newfoundland and Labrador populations.
Mineral exploration
Mineral exploration in the Tulameen area currentlyrepresents a greater threat to B.C. mountain holly fern populations than mining. Figure 6 illustrates the locations of current and past mining activities near mountain holly fern populations. Mining and mineral exploration are not considered threats for Québec or Newfoundland and Labrador populations.
Mountain pine beetle control
The Merritt Timber Supply Area in B.C. is experiencing an exponential increase in mountain pine beetle attack and the B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range is currently taking “an aggressive pro-active approach to identifying and managing the destructive forest pests” (Senger 2006). As part of their strategy, they set a forest licensee salvage/sanitation harvest target of 212,524 m3 in the Tulameen Landscape Unit (where the B.C. mountain holly fern populations occur) in 2006–2007 (Senger 2006). However, the 3 known populations of mountain holly fern occupy less than 2 ha of the Tulameen Landscape Unit and it is unknown how much of this harvest could overlap with mountain holly fern populations.
Salvage logging activities of this nature could result in habitat destruction by disturbing rocks and soil. Plants could also be destroyed by heavy machinery and buried under disturbed rocks and soil. Mountain pine beetle control is not a threat for Québec or Newfoundland and Labrador populations.
Road construction
Road construction is apotential threat near mountain holly fern populations in B.C. The construction of mining exploration roads is not subject to the same degree of regulation as that of forestry roads, and they may cause more habitat destruction. Road construction is not a threat for Québec or Newfoundland and Labrador populations.
Climate change
The potential impacts of climate change on mountain holly fern populations are difficult to assess. Although altered climate regimes may be favourable for populations by creating conditions more similar to those in the centre of the species’ range, there is a risk of more extreme climatic conditions, which could potentially reduce the viability of populations (e.g., more severe droughts). Climate change is a potential threat to the species throughout its range.
Slope failure
Severe slope failures (due to the colluvial nature of the soil) could eradicate some populations. It is not known which populations are most at risk due to this potential threat but it applies to populations throughout Canada.
Severe fire
Severe fires could eradicate the B.C. mountain holly fern populations. The populations occur within areas where stand-replacing fires are expected to occur every 4–50 years or every 100 years (Natural Disturbance Types 3 and 4) (Senger 2006).
The Québec population is less at risk because it occurs above the tree line (COSEWIC 2005). The Newfoundland and Labrador population, if extant, is unlikely to be at risk due to severe fire because of the climate in which it occurs (C. Hanel, pers. comm., 2007).
Botanical collecting
Given the small population sizes of mountain holly fern in Canada (Table 1), indiscriminate botanical collecting in extant populations could have significant impacts on population sizes. This potential threat is a minor one for all of the Canadian populations due to their locations, which are either remote, or at least removed from human pathways.
Actions Already Completed or Underway
A preliminary conservation plan has been drafted for the Québec population (MDDEP 2006). Searching for the historic Newfoundland and Labrador population was conducted in 2000 (seven people searched for one day). No specific recovery actions have been completed or are underway in B.C.
Knowledge Gaps
Recovery efforts for mountain holly fern in Canada are limited by several knowledge gaps, discussed below.
Distribution of species in Canada
The potential for finding additional populations in B.C. is relatively high. Known populations occur at montane ultramafic sites. Ultramafic sites have attracted a lot of botanical interest, but mountain holly fern populations are likely easily overlooked, particularly when the species co-occurs with other Polystichum species such as the more common Kruckeberg’s holly fern (Polystichum kruckebergii)which is found in the area. Also, some ultramafic sites occur in remote mountainous areas that have presumably received less search effort.
Additional survey effort is needed to determine whether the historic Newfoundland and Labrador population is extant. Relatively little survey effort has been devoted to the area due to its remote location (boat access only) (C. Hanel, pers. comm., 2007). The Newfoundland and Labrador specimen of mountain holly fern was also originally misidentified as Braun’s hollyfern (Polystichum braunii) until 1978 (Wagner and Rouleau 1984).
The likelihood of finding additional populations in Québec is relatively low, given the intensive search effort that has been devoted to ultramafic sites (G. Hall, F. Coursol, pers. comm. via M. Wild 2007).
Gametophyte ecology
The importance of the gametophyte stage in the reproduction of mountain holly fern in Canada is unknown, as are the habitat requirements of the gametophyte, if applicable (gametophytes have not been observed in Canada). Information about gametophyte ecology would influence recovery actions and could be used to refine a definition of critical habitat.
Vegetative reproduction
The importance of vegetative reproduction in population persistence, growth, and dispersal is unknown. If vegetative reproduction is the primary mode of reproduction as suggested by COSEWIC (2005), recovery actions and the estimation of population viabilities will be influenced.
Genetics of Canadian populations
Investigations are needed to determine whether Canadian populations consist of the normal fertile tetraploid form or of the sterile diploid form of mountain holly fern (Wagner and Rouleau 1984). This information would influence recovery actions and estimates of population viability.
Recovery
Recovery Feasibility
The recovery of mountain holly fern in Canada is feasible, based on the following criteria:
- Mature sporophytes capable of vegetative reproduction (and possibly sexual reproduction) are currently available to improve the population growth rate and population abundance.
- Sufficient suitable habitat is available to support the species (according to the known habitat requirements).
- Significant threats to the species or its habitat can be avoided or mitigated through recovery actions.
- The necessary recovery techniques exist -- most have been demonstrated to be effective.
Recovery Goal
The recovery goal for mountain holly fern is to protect and maintain all known Footnote1 populations in Canada.
Rationale for the Recovery Goal
The recovery goal is based on ensuring the survival of the species in Canada. Distribution within Canada was historically, and is currently, very restricted. While the populations face some threats, the recovery potential of mountain holly fern is primarily limited by the biological factors discussed in the “Limiting factors” section.
Recovery Objectives
The recovery goal for mountain holly fern is supported by the following objectives (which should be achieved by 2014):
- to secure long-term protection for extant populations and their habitats (areas of occupancy plus appropriate essential habitat);
- to refine the current distribution of the species in Canada;
- to address knowledge gaps including: determining population trends, demographic patterns, and life history (survival and reproduction) of extant populations; and
- to determine whether augmentation of the populations is necessary and, if required, de velop and test techniques to establish populations on existing and historic sites.
Approaches Recommended to Meet Recovery Objectives
Recovery planning table
Recovery planning for mountain holly fern is summarized in Table 4.
Priority | Threat or concern addressed | Broad strategy to address threat | Recommended approaches to meet recovery objectives |
---|---|---|---|
High | Mining and mineral exploration, mountain pine beetle control, road construction, slope failure, severe fire | Protection (habitat, species), management (habitat, species), stewardship, research, enforcement, coordination, communication and outreach |
|
Low | Botanical collecting | Communication and outreach |
|
Priority | Threat or concern addressed | Broad strategy to address threat | Recommended approaches to meet recovery objectives |
---|---|---|---|
Medium | Knowledge gaps | Inventory, communication and outreach |
|
Priority | Threat or concern addressed | Broad strategy to address threat | Recommended approaches to meet recovery objectives |
---|---|---|---|
Medium | Knowledge Gaps | Research, inventory, and monitoring |
|
Priority | Threat or concern addressed | Broad strategy to address threat | Recommended approaches to meet recovery objectives |
---|---|---|---|
Low | Climate change (and to support the recovery goal in general) |
Research, propagation |
|
B.C. = British Columbia; NL = Newfoundland and Labrador; QC = Québec.
Description of the recovery planning table
The first high priority of recovery planning is to protect the populations and habitats of mountain holly fern in Canada. This objective addresses the majority of the threats to the species and prevents the extirpation of populations due to anthropogenic causes in the short term. Most of the recovery approaches focus on the B.C. populations. Although B.C. populations occur on provincial Crown land, they are not covered by any stewardship initiatives nor are they specifically protected.
The first medium priority objective is to refine the distribution of the species in Canada. The finding of additional populations of mountain holly fern (or finding the historic Newfoundland and Labrador population) could influence the status of the species and the future refinement of recovery objectives. Although ultramafic habitats in Canada have been the focus of considerable botanical survey effort, mountain holly fern can be confused with other Polystichum species in the field where they co-occur. In B.C., mountain holly fern can easily be mistaken for the more common and blue-listed, Kruckeberg’s holly fern Polystichum kruckebergii. In Newfoundland and Labrador, the single mountain holly fern specimen from 1950 was originally mistaken for Polystichum braunii and the specimen was not correctly identified for 28 years (Wagner and Rouleau 1984). Targeted field surveys for the species may therefore reveal additional occurrences. Québec is a lower priority for inventory given that considerable search effort has been undertaken in ultramafic habitats, and no other Polystichum species occur in ultramafic habitats there (G. Hall and F. Coursol, pers. comm. via M. Wild, 2007).
The second medium priority objective is estimating the viability of extant populations. This objective addresses many of the knowledge gaps related to the recovery of mountain holly fern. Once the biology and demography of the species is better understood, more specific recovery objectives can be formulated towards meeting the recovery goal for the species in Canada.
Finally, a low priority objective entails determining whether augmentation of the populations is necessary, and if required, develop and test techniques to establish populations on existing and historic sites. Given (1993) recommends that off-site garden collections and germplasm banks be maintained for fern species as a back-up to in situ conservation through the protection of natural habitats. These techniques will be necessary if population objectives are eventually refined to include population augmentation based on additional information about population viability.
Performance Measures
The following performance measures will evaluate the success of the recovery strategy in meeting its objectives:
- population monitoring indicates that the numbers of plants at the known existing sites are stable or increasing by 2014;
- suitable habitat in B.C. for new populations, and in Newfoundland and Labrador for the historic population has been surveyed and documented by 2014;
- demographic patterns and life history (survival and reproduction) of extant populations has been investigated by 2014;
- review of population demographics and life history information has determined whether the populations should be augmented in any of the three jurisdictions by 2014; and
- the known mountain holly fern sites in B.C. are recognized by managers in the B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range and included in their forests and range management plans for fire protection and mountain pine beetle control by 2014.
Critical Habitat
Identification of the species' critical habitat
Critical habitat as legally defined under the federal Species at Risk Act will not be proposed until data gaps are addressed and consultation is complete. Relatively little is known about the specific habitat needs of the species or its distribution, and more definitive work must be completed before any specific sites will be formally proposed as critical habitat. It is expected that critical habitat will be proposed following consultation and development of stewardship options with affected landowners and organizations, and completion of outstanding work required to identify specific habitat and area requirements for this species where required.
No critical habitat will be proposed in Newfoundland and Labrador unless the historically known population is confirmed to be extant. If applicable, proposed critical habitat will be addressed through a schedule of studies as part of an action plan for the species.
Recommended schedule of studies to identify critical habitat
Additional information is needed to define the critical habitat of mountain holly fern in B.C. Several studies should be completed within the next 5 years to refine recommendations for critical habitat (Table 5).
Description of activity | Outcome/Rationale | Timeline |
---|---|---|
Using established survey and mapping techniques delineate the boundaries of all occupied habitats for all extant Canadian populations | Mapping of the extant areas of occupancy is needed to define critical habitat | 2009–2014 |
Identify habitat attributes at extant sites | Determine the necessary abiotic and biotic attributes required for critical habitat | 2009-2014 |
Complete survey for extant populations in Newfoundland and Labrador | Areas of occupancy of new populations should be considered for critical habitat | 2009–2014 |
Complete inventory for additional populations in B.C. | Areas of occupancy of new populations should be considered for critical habitat | 2009–2014 |
Existing and Recommended Approaches to Habitat Protection
The Québec population is protected within a provincial park (le Parc national de la Gaspésie), and a conservation plan has been drafted for the species. The B.C. populations occur on provincial Crown land, but the habitat of mountain holly fern is not formally protected. The following approaches to habitat protection in B.C. are recommended:
- identify mountain holly fern as a species at risk under the B.C. Forest and Range Practices Act and establish Wildlife Habitat Areas as appropriate;
- Land Act designations for the conservation of a natural resource under Section 17 can be sought to make land users aware of the location of mountain holly fern;
- facilitation of the development of an appropriate road construction plan in the areas where mountain holly fern occurs with B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range and Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources;
- communication of the road construction plan to forestry and mining contractors; and
- provide assistance to the B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range in developing site protection and management plans for the known existing mountain holly fern sites.
The historical Newfoundland and Labrador population is thought to occur on provincial Crown land (C. Hanel, pers. comm., 2007) with no special habitat protection in place.
Effects on Other Species
In B.C., mountain holly fern occurs in the same habitats with Kruckeberg’s holly fern (Polystichum kruckebergii). This species is ranked by the B.C. Conservation Data Centre as Red-listed in the province and by NatureServe as critically imperiled (S1) (B.C. CDC 2007; NatureServe 2007), however, it is widespread in the area and also overlaps with the smaller mountain holly fern sites. Mountain holly fern populations also occur in an area where there have been many observations of Mountain Beaver (Aplodontia rufa), which is considered vulnerable (Blue-listed) in B.C. and of Special Concern in Canada (B.C. CDC 2007; COSEWIC 2005). The Mountain Beaver uses wetter habitats than those colonized by mountain holly fern; however, recovery activities for all species are expected to positively impact the associated rare species and ecological communities, by ensuring local habitat protection. Recovery activities in Québec are not expected to have any effects on other species, as habitat protection is already in place. Recovery activities in Newfoundland and Labrador are not expected to have effects on other species.
Socioeconomic Considerations
Recovery activities in B.C. could have negative impacts on mining interests, but the impacts are expected to be low. Recovery activities for the species in Québec and Newfoundland and Labrador are expected to have negligible socioeconomic impacts.
Recommended Approach for Recovery Implementation
Because three jurisdictions are involved, each with different species at risk legislation, regulations, policies, and priorities, it is recommended that each jurisdiction prepare an action plan under its respective program as detailed in Table 6.
Jurisdiction | Responsible agency | Federal representative | Type of action plan |
---|---|---|---|
British Columbia | Province of British Columbia | Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service (Pacific-Yukon) | Single-species |
Québec | Province of Québec | Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service (Québec) | Single-species or multi-species |
Newfoundland and Labrador | Province of Newfoundland and Labrador | Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service (Atlantic) | Single-species (if applicable) |
Statement on Action Plans
Actions plans for the recovery strategy should be completed as follows under the approach outlined in Table 6:
- by 2014 in British Columbia;
- by 2014 in Québec; and
- in Newfoundland and Labrador, if the presence of the species is confirmed, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador will consider listing the species under the Newfoundland and Labrador Endangered Species Act. A listing of Threatened or Endangered will require the development of a recovery plan however the Province can adopt a national plan if one exists. The timeline for the development of an action plan should take about 2 years from the time of legal listing. If the species presence is confirmed, but the species is not listed under Provincial legislation, the Province will consult with the Federal Government regarding the conservation of the species.
References
Barrington, D.S. 1993. Ecological and historical factors in fern biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 20(3):275–279.
B.C. Conservation Data Centre (B.C. CDC). 2007. Conservation Data Centre Mapping Service [web application]. Victoria, BC. [Accessed Feb. 6, 2007]
B.C. Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources (B.C. MEMPR). 2007. Mineral activity maps.[Accessed Feb. 1, 2007]
Brooks, R. 1987. Serpentine and its vegetation. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2005. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the mountain holly fern Polystichum scopulinumem> in Canada."Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, ON. [Accessed Feb. 1, 2007]
Douglas, G.W., D. Meidinger, and J. Pojar, eds. 2000. Volume 5. Dicotyledons (Salicaceae through Zygophyllaceae) and Pteridophytes. In Illustrated flora of British Columbia. B.C. Min. Environ., Lands and Parks and B.C. Min. For., Victoria, BC.
Farrar, D.R. 1976. Spore retention and release from overwintering fern fronds. Am. Fern J. 66(2):49–52.
Given, D.R. 1993. Changing aspects of endemism and endangerment in Pteridophyta. J. Biogeogr. 20(3):293–302.
Graham, J. and J. Ackerfield. 2007. Information for Polystichum scopulinum (mountain hollyfern). PICEA Database. Colorado State University Herbarium [Accessed Feb. 6, 2007]
Kruckeberg, A. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils, and management problems. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Longwell, C.R., R.F. Flint, and J.E. Sanders. 1969. Physical geology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs (MDDEP). 2006. Plan de conservation préliminaire du polystic des rochers (Polystichum scopulinum): espèce menacée au Québec. Avril 2006. Direction du patrimoine écologique et des parcs, Gouvernement du Québec.
Montana Natural Heritage Program. 2007. Polystichum scopulinum. Montana plant field guide [Accessed Feb. 6, 2007]
NatureServe. 2007. NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life. Version 6.1. Arlington, VA. [Accessed Feb. 1, 2007]
Senger, E. 2006. 2006/2007 Merritt TSA Forest Health Strategy. (PDF: 4.15 mb; 33 pages) Prepared by Landscope Consulting Corporation for the Cascades Forest District. (pdf: 4.15 mb; 33 pages)Lillooet, BC. [Accessed Mar. 20, 2007]
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2007. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center, Natural Resources Conservation Centre, Baton Rouge, LA. [Accessed Feb. 6, 2007]
Wagner, D.H. 1993. Polystichum. In Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds. 1993+. Vol. 2. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms. Flora of North America North of Mexico. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2007]
Wagner, Jr., W.H. and E. Rouleau. 1984. A western holly fern, Polystichum × scopulinum, in Newfoundland. Am. Fern J. 74(2):33–36.
Wheeler, J.O., P.F. Hoffman, K.D. Card, A. Davidson, B.V. Sanford, A.V. Okulitch, and W.R. Roest. 1996. Geological map of Canada. “A” Series Map, 1860A. Digital map. Geological Survey of Canada. [Accessed Feb. 1, 2007]
Wild, M. and D. Gagnon. 2005. Does lack of available suitable habitat explain the patchy distributions of rare calcicole fern species? Ecography 28:191–196.
Wild, M., D. Gagnon, and A. Bouchard. 2006. Why are ferns regularly over-represented on state and provincial rare plant lists? Divers. Distrib. 12:749–755.
Personal Communications
Coursol, Frédéric. 2007. Botanist. QC.
Hanel, Claudia. 2007. Ecosystem Management Ecologist (Botanist), Wildlife Division, Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Environment and Conservation, Corner Brook, NL.
Wild, Matthew. 2007. Species at Risk Biologist, Canadian Wildlife Service - Québec Region, Environment Canada.
Page details
- Date modified: